Post by stephenpatrick on Aug 23, 2009 20:27:18 GMT -5
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=107268
The latest from the dispy's.
New research says that the anti-christ "now" will be from the Mideast, not Europe.
Since many of the people that made up the Roman armies weren't all from Europe or Italy, but made up from many of the nations that Rome conquered, "the people" from Daniel 9:26 must mean the foreigners that fought along side the Romans in AD 70. (Correction: conscripted soldiers from the surrounding nations) The foreigners were responsible for the destruction of Jerusalem, not the europeans. Mohammed Titus?
It never ends . . . .
The latest from the dispy's.
New research says that the anti-christ "now" will be from the Mideast, not Europe.
Since many of the people that made up the Roman armies weren't all from Europe or Italy, but made up from many of the nations that Rome conquered, "the people" from Daniel 9:26 must mean the foreigners that fought along side the Romans in AD 70. (Correction: conscripted soldiers from the surrounding nations) The foreigners were responsible for the destruction of Jerusalem, not the europeans. Mohammed Titus?
It never ends . . . .